Posts

GIS Portfolio

 I created a GIS portfolio using ArcGIS StoryMaps to showcase my professional work as a GIS Analyst in local government. The portfolio highlights a range of projects demonstrating technical skills, applied GIS workflows, and real-world problem-solving. Using StoryMaps allowed me to combine interactive maps, visuals, and project descriptions in a clean, organized format. Each project includes information on the datasets used, GIS tools and methods applied, and the resulting outputs. Key projects featured in the portfolio include: LiDAR and Elevation Analysis – Creating DEMs, DSMs, and Canopy Height Models for 3D visualization of forest structure. Coastal Flooding & Storm Surge Analysis – Mapping flood zones and estimating structural impacts using high-resolution DEMs and building data. Hurricane Damage Assessment – Evaluating the effect of Hurricane Sandy on coastal structures and analyzing damage patterns relative to coastline proximity. Suitability & Leas...

GIS5935 Mod6: Scale Effect and Spatial Data Aggregation

Image
 In this lab, I had the chance to dive deep into how scale and resolution affect spatial data and how spatial aggregation can impact analysis outcomes. I started with hydrographic vector data for Wake County at multiple scales—from 1:1,200 to 1:100,000. Comparing the total lengths, areas, and perimeters of rivers and lakes, it was clear that larger-scale data captures far more detail, while smaller-scale data tends to generalize features and omit smaller elements. This exercise highlighted how scale influences geometric properties, which is critical when making decisions or interpreting spatial patterns. Next, I examined raster data by working with LIDAR-derived DEMs at various resolutions. As expected, coarser resolutions smoothed out the terrain and lowered the average slope, while finer resolutions captured subtle topographic variations. This illustrated the importance of choosing the right resolution for accurate terrain modeling and slope analysis—too coarse and you lose impor...

GIS Internship Post #3: LinkedIn update

Image
  I actually set up my LinkedIn profile years ago, but I never really used it. It was just there—basic info, a photo, and my job history—but I didn’t put much thought into it or engage with anyone. Recently, I decided it was time to give it some attention. I updated my headline and summary to better reflect my skills and experience, fixed outdated job info, and made sure everything looked clean and professional. I haven’t started posting or adding projects yet, but just refreshing my profile feels like a good first step. For me, LinkedIn is now more of a “ready when I need it” tool. Even a little effort to update it makes it feel useful and gives me a profile I can confidently share if an opportunity comes up. You can view my LinkedIn account at this URL https://www.linkedin.com/in/alec-stapp-b412441a8

GIS5935: Mod5 Surface Interpolation

Image
 In this lab, we explored different interpolation methods to create continuous surfaces from point data using ArcGIS Pro. Part A focused on generating a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from elevation points using IDW and Spline interpolation. Comparing the two surfaces showed that Spline produces smoother results but can exaggerate extreme values, while IDW provides a more realistic representation of terrain. Raster calculations highlighted the areas where the two methods differ. Part B applied interpolation to water quality data in Tampa Bay. Thiessen polygons, IDW, and Spline methods were used to create continuous surfaces. Results showed that Spline can overestimate values in areas with sparse sampling, whereas IDW and Thiessen provide more conservative estimates. This lab emphasized the importance of choosing an appropriate interpolation method based on data distribution, density, and analysis goals.

GIS5935: Mod4 TINs and DEMs

Image
 In this lab, I explored how different elevation models—TINs (Triangulated Irregular Networks) and DEMs (Digital Elevation Models)—represent terrain and how they can be applied in GIS analysis. The exercises emphasized both visualization and analysis, showing the strengths and limitations of each model. In Part A, I draped a radar image over a TIN of Death Valley, then exaggerated the vertical scale to better highlight subtle landforms. This helped illustrate how 3D visualization can reveal relationships between surface features and elevation patterns. In Part B, I worked with a DEM to build a ski run suitability map. By reclassifying elevation, slope, and aspect, then combining them with weighted values, I created a raster showing areas most suitable for ski runs. Displaying the result in 3D with appropriate symbology highlighted how terrain factors interact in real-world site selection. In Part C, I experimented with TIN symbology, adjusting slope, aspect, edges, and contours to ...

GIS Internship post 2

 For this assignment, I was asked to reflect on my "dream job" or a job search exercise. I decided to focus on my current position because it truly represents the kind of GIS work I want to be doing. I serve as the GIS Analyst for the City of Crestview, overseeing all GIS operations (right now, that’s just me!). My role is to provide spatial data, analysis, and maps to any city department that needs them, which keeps my work varied and engaging. Completing this assignment reminded me of how much I have learned on the job. I have developed strong skills in ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Online, managing geodatabases, running spatial analyses, and producing professional-quality maps. I also integrate data from multiple sources; utilities, parcel data, and transportation networks. One of my key takeaways from this assignment is that GIS is a career of constant growth. The skills I still need to acquire usually reveal themselves when a new challenge arises, and I enjoy the opportunity t...

GIS5935: Mod3 Data Quality - Assessment

Image
  In this module, we focused on assessing the quality and completeness of road network data. The main goal was to compare two datasets for Jackson County—Street Centerlines and TIGER Roads—to determine which network provides more comprehensive coverage. Completeness was measured using a simple yet effective method: calculating the total length of roads both across the county and within 1 km² grid cells. This approach allows for a spatially detailed comparison and highlights areas where one dataset may be missing roads. The analysis involved projecting the datasets to a common coordinate system, calculating road segment lengths, and summarizing the totals for each grid cell. From this, we could determine both the overall completeness and the relative differences across the county. Numerical summaries identified which network was more complete in specific areas, while visual mapping of percentage differences highlighted spatial patterns that are not immediately obvious from raw numbe...